conv
is the syntax category for a "conv tactic", where "conv" is short
for conversion. A conv tactic is a program which receives a target, printed as
| a
, and is tasked with coming up with some term b
and a proof of a = b
.
It is mainly used for doing targeted term transformations, for example rewriting
only on the left side of an equality.
Instances For
The *
occurrence list means to apply to all occurrences of the pattern.
Instances For
A list 1 2 4
of occurrences means to apply to the first, second, and fourth
occurrence of the pattern.
Instances For
An occurrence specification, either *
or a list of numbers. The default is [1]
.
Instances For
with_annotate_state stx t
annotates the lexical range of stx : Syntax
with
the initial and final state of running tactic t
.
Instances For
Traverses into the left subterm of a binary operator.
(In general, for an n
-ary operator, it traverses into the second to last argument.)
Instances For
Traverses into the right subterm of a binary operator.
(In general, for an n
-ary operator, it traverses into the last argument.)
Instances For
Expands let-declarations and let-variables.
Instances For
Puts term in normal form, this tactic is meant for debugging purposes only.
Instances For
Performs one step of "congruence", which takes a term and produces
subgoals for all the function arguments. For example, if the target is f x y
then
congr
produces two subgoals, one for x
and one for y
.
Instances For
ext x
traverses into a binder (a fun x => e
or ∀ x, e
expression)
to target e
, introducing name x
in the process.
Instances For
change t'
replaces the target t
with t'
,
assuming t
and t'
are definitionally equal.
Instances For
unfold foo
unfolds all occurrences offoo
in the target.unfold id1 id2 ...
is equivalent tounfold id1; unfold id2; ...
. Like theunfold
tactic, this uses equational lemmas for the chosen definition to rewrite the target. For recursive definitions, only one layer of unfolding is performed.
Instances For
pattern pat
traverses to the first subterm of the target that matchespat
.pattern (occs := *) pat
traverses to every subterm of the target that matchespat
which is not contained in another match ofpat
. It generates one subgoal for each matching subterm.pattern (occs := 1 2 4) pat
matches occurrences1, 2, 4
ofpat
and produces three subgoals. Occurrences are numbered left to right from the outside in.
Note that skipping an occurrence of pat
will traverse inside that subexpression, which means
it may find more matches and this can affect the numbering of subsequent pattern matches.
For example, if we are searching for f _
in f (f a) = f b
:
occs := 1 2
(andoccs := *
) returns| f (f a)
and| f b
occs := 2
returns| f a
occs := 2 3
returns| f a
and| f b
occs := 1 3
is an error, because after skippingf b
there is no third match.
Instances For
rw [thm]
rewrites the target using thm
. See the rw
tactic for more information.
Instances For
simp_match
simplifies match expressions. For example,
match [a, b] with
| [] => 0
| hd :: tl => hd
simplifies to a
.
Instances For
Executes the given tactic block without converting conv
goal into a regular goal.
Instances For
Executes the given conv block without converting regular goal into a conv
goal.
Instances For
{ convs }
runs the list of convs
on the current target, and any subgoals that
remain are trivially closed by skip
.
Instances For
(convs)
runs the convs
in sequence on the current list of targets.
This is pure grouping with no added effects.
Instances For
rfl
closes one conv goal "trivially", by using reflexivity
(that is, no rewriting).
Instances For
done
succeeds iff there are no goals remaining.
Instances For
trace_state
prints the current goal state.
Instances For
all_goals tac
runs tac
on each goal, concatenating the resulting goals, if any.
Instances For
any_goals tac
applies the tactic tac
to every goal, and succeeds if at
least one application succeeds.
Instances For
case tag => tac
focuses on the goal with case nametag
and solves it usingtac
, or else fails.case tag x₁ ... xₙ => tac
additionally renames then
most recent hypotheses with inaccessible names to the given names.case tag₁ | tag₂ => tac
is equivalent to(case tag₁ => tac); (case tag₂ => tac)
.
Instances For
next => tac
focuses on the next goal and solves it using tac
, or else fails.
next x₁ ... xₙ => tac
additionally renames the n
most recent hypotheses with
inaccessible names to the given names.
Instances For
focus tac
focuses on the main goal, suppressing all other goals, and runs tac
on it.
Usually · tac
, which enforces that the goal is closed by tac
, should be preferred.
Instances For
conv => cs
runs cs
in sequence on the target t
,
resulting in t'
, which becomes the new target subgoal.
Instances For
· conv
focuses on the main conv goal and tries to solve it using s
.
Instances For
fail_if_success t
fails if the tactic t
succeeds.
Instances For
rw [rules]
applies the given list of rewrite rules to the target.
See the rw
tactic for more information.
Instances For
erw [rules]
is a shorthand for rw (config := { transparency := .default }) [rules]
.
This does rewriting up to unfolding of regular definitions (by comparison to regular rw
which only unfolds @[reducible]
definitions).
Instances For
args
traverses into all arguments. Synonym for congr
.
Instances For
left
traverses into the left argument. Synonym for lhs
.
Instances For
right
traverses into the right argument. Synonym for rhs
.
Instances For
intro
traverses into binders. Synonym for ext
.
Instances For
enter [arg, ...]
is a compact way to describe a path to a subterm.
It is a shorthand for other conv tactics as follows:
enter [i]
is equivalent toarg i
.enter [@i]
is equivalent toarg @i
.enter [x]
(wherex
is an identifier) is equivalent toext x
. For example, given the targetf (g a (fun x => x b))
,enter [1, 2, x, 1]
will traverse to the subtermb
.
Instances For
The apply thm
conv tactic is the same as apply thm
the tactic.
There are no restrictions on thm
, but strange results may occur if thm
cannot be reasonably interpreted as proving one equality from a list of others.
Instances For
try tac
runs tac
and succeeds even if tac
failed.
Instances For
repeat convs
runs the sequence convs
repeatedly until it fails to apply.
Instances For
conv => ...
allows the user to perform targeted rewriting on a goal or hypothesis,
by focusing on particular subexpressions.
See https://leanprover.github.io/theorem_proving_in_lean4/conv.html for more details.
Basic forms:
conv => cs
will rewrite the goal with conv tacticscs
.conv at h => cs
will rewrite hypothesish
.conv in pat => cs
will rewrite the first subexpression matchingpat
(seepattern
).